E is for Editing

I hate it.

Okay, that’s not exactly true. I enjoy first draft writing the most, but there are things I really enjoy about editing as well.

It’s just not as much fun as writing. The first draft is like a magical mixing bowl where you can create a village that lives on the back of a dragon who fights other dragons with villages on their backs. And just as the battle is winding down, Aliens!

Once in the editing stage, lines have been drawn, boxes created, and now you have to stay within them.

In the early stages of editing, taking to a rough manuscript is like discovering a brand new way to write.

Have an artist paint a portrait with his brushes, and then make him do it again using only his fingers. It’s like that. A big change.

One the hardest things to deal with is switching from first draft writing to editing. Most of the time it feels like another writer comes in to sit in your chair, and he’s there until the editing is done. And it’s just as tough to switch back to first draft writing.

Though there are several stages for the writer to take on, he (or she) should not be alone. A humble writer will know that a manuscript can’t be at it’s best without another set of eyes. Preferably more, and one set of those eyes should belong to a professional editor.

I learned years ago that no matter how many times I read and edited my work, there were always mistakes that got through. Typos that my eye passed over as my mind, which knows the way the sentence should be, fixed the mistake allowing it to live.

It’s not all bad. There’s a certain challenge to it that you can’t get anywhere else. And while it’s not as fun as writing, it’s far more integral in getting to a finished product.

Next time, I talk about an F-word.

D is for Doctor Who

A little over a year ago, I knew very little about Doctor Who. I knew it was a television show, I had heard the name in pop culture references, and that there was some kind of blue phone booth involved. Beyond that, I always thought, “Not a show for me.”

This is one of those situations where I couldn’t be happier to be proven wrong.

If you were to look at my Netflix history over the last year you’d see a lot of Pokemon (not me, my kids, I swear) and a lot of Doctor Who. I’ve burned through most of the catalogue, with just a few episodes left of the seventh season as I write this post.

The show originally started in 1963 telling stories of The Doctor, from an alien race known as the Time Lords, as he ventures around time and space in his ship called the TARDIS. That’s the thing that looks like a phone booth, but it’s much bigger on the inside.

The original actor to play The Doctor was William Hartnell. After a few years in the role, Hartnell’s health started to decline and he was becoming increasingly more difficult to work with each episode. That’s when the show’s creators came up with something brilliant: regeneration.

Time Lords have this little trick, a way of cheating death, and it’s called regeneration. Under the strain of what would kill any normal human, The Doctor’s regenerative abilities kick in to completely heal him, but there’s a stipulation. As the ninth Doctor says, “It’s a bit dodgy, this process.”

After regeneration, The Doctor looks like a completely different person complete with a new personality. The tenth Doctor explained that it was like he was dying a new man would be taking his place. We see that as viewers as a different actor takes over after each regeneration.

On the business side, this is brilliant. No actor could ever threaten to leave the show if demands aren’t met, and there’s no reason for an actor to stay “trapped” in a role if he feels limited. There’s no reason why the show would never need to end. At least not due to an actor situation.

Daleks, Cybermen, Weeping Angels, Amy Pond. I could go on for pages about Doctor Who, but let’s consider this an intro into the show and end there. There’s one main question any Doctor Who fan will be wondering of me. Matt Smith is my favorite.

Check back Monday for the next post in my A to Z blogging challenge. It should be exciting. EEEEEEE!

C is for Cryptozoology

Living Legend is coming out a little later this year and in the progress of writing it, I did a lot of research nto Cryptozoology. I thought it was going to a journey into strange desires and controversies. I was wrong.

It’s fascinating.

The pseudoscience is most commonly associated with the study of creatures like the Loch Ness monster and bigfoot, and though that’s part of it, it’s not the whole of it.

Cryptozoology is the study of animals whose existence is not proven. On the surface, that may sound like the same thing, but there are some differences.

Trying to prove a species still exists after being declared extinct would fall under Cryptozoology. If you go out and make it your goal to find a living dodo bird, guess what, you’re a Cryptozoologist.

The second difference is not all animals searched for are sasquatches and dinosaur-like creatures. These studies have actually brought about the discovery of a few brand new species.

The Okapi was thought to be a joke or a hallucination due to how absurd it must have sounded to describe to someone. “Well, you see, it’s somewhere between a giraffe and a deer with zebra stripes.” Who wouldn’t think you were drinking? But in 1901 these funny-looking guys were discovered in the Congo.

Same story goes for the Komodo Dragon. It was feared and revered as a myth known only as the Giant Monitor. The real thing was found in the Indonesian islands in 1912.

Most cryptozoologists reject supernatural beliefs and prefer to follow the scientific method, though they sometimes have to stray when physical proof isn’t available. Still, when other stories turned out to be real could you ever completely dismiss a myth again?

B is for Banovsky’s Weird Cars

weirdCarsWeird Cars by Michael Banovsky is a fantastic trip into the most obscure alleyways the automotive industry has ever created and, in some cases, covered up. This isn’t a book that reveals a few odd facts about cars we all know, this is a book that introduces a lengthy line-up of cars you’ve probably never even heard of.This book talks about cars with 4 wheels, 3 wheels, 6 wheels, no wheels. Interiors that seat four, a dozen or only one.

You’ll learn about cars like Simca Fulgar which could have been the inspiration for “The Homer.”

If you built a small screened in porch and then put it on wheels you’d have something very close to the Quasar Unipower.

Then there’s the Taylor Aerocar, which is exactly like it sounds: a car with wings.

The best part of Weird Cars is it’s delivery. It’s much more than a dry download of information. Banovsky mixes fact and wit to deliver a read that entertains as it informs. Like having a school teacher who’s more concerned with getting laughs than following a curriculum, and no homework.

Okay, I lied about that being the best part. There’s something even better.

The book is available through Amazon, both in print and digital, but it’s also available for free in the form of Michael Banovsky’s daily blog. The book has 77 cars, his blog has hundreds.

neweditor-01Head over to www.banovsky.com and read about every car from the book along with hundreds more. Subscribe to it, and Banovsky’s car of the day will be delivered to your inbox every day.Author Michael Banovsky plans on publishing follow-ups to this book but, if you want to get in on the ground floor, every car shows up on his blog long before it finds its way into a book.

Michael Banovsky has been in the car industry for most of his working life. Currently, he’s the Content Manager for one of the coolest automotive content generators on the internet: Petrolicious.

This is day two of my A to Z Blogging Challenge. Check in again tomorrow to C what I write about. (Told ya. Puns all month long.)

A is for Attempting Something New

For many bloggers April has become something other than a rainy, spring month. For these few who enjoy punishing themselves, it’s become the time of year when they attempt the A to Z Blog Challenge.

This challenge requires bloggers to write one post for each day of the month of April, except Sundays. 26 posts in all. There’s also 26 letters in the alphabet. Anyone wondering why it’s called the “A to Z Challenge” is now going, “Ohhhh.”

That’s right, one post for each letter of the alphabet and the topic of the post needs to start with the letter of the day. For example, today would be A, and someone could write a post about “Attempting Something New.”

Tomorrow, the second day, there will be posts on everything from babies to ballistas, batteries to bombs, bobby pins to blueberries.

If you don’t know what the third day will offer you’ll just have to wait and C.

Why am I talking about this when I can’t seem to consistently post to my blog? Because I can’t seem to consistently post to my blog, but I’d like to start.

Taking on this A to Z challenge could teach me to do that. It could also be a month filled with so much posting that I spend the next three not posting a thing. There’s also a chance that I fail out of that challenge by the third week or the third day, but that’s why they call it a challenge. If it was easy, there wouldn’t be a point.

If you want to see what I write about next, or even if you want to check to see if I’ve already failed the challenge, make sure to B here tomorrow. (Yes, I plan on making many letter puns throughout the month.)

Click Control

It’s time we all admit it, the word ‘click’ is out of control.

It’s a sound, an action, a way of quickly becoming friends with someone, a description for sudden enlightenment, and, if you replace the first letter with a ‘K’, it also works as a unit of measurement. That’s already a lot for a little 5-letter word, but it’s use is increasing.

Remote controls are somewhat commonly called ‘the clicker’. I understand the reference, I’ve even used it myself, even though it’s wrong. Technically, the person pressing the buttons on the remote is the clicker, not the remote itself. But since there really isn’t any confusion there, I’m going to leave that one alone.

The most common use now is likely the click of a computer mouse. Anyone who’s ever had to call to tech support, or even taken direction from your friend who’s good with computers, has heard, “Okay, click here, click that, now click the X and click down there.”

A mouse click makes sense. You press the button on the mouse, it makes a click sound, the action is named after the sound.

With the integration of touch screen technology, a lot of people directing a friend still tell them to ‘click’ something. I’ve even seen videos from large companies directing people to their app by ‘clicking’ the app store and ‘clicking’ download.

Again, something I’ve been guilty of as well, but in this case ‘click’ is wrong. The person that used to click the mouse is still present but with nothing to click. The clicker has nothing click. Tap, drag and pinch are working their way into our vocabularies, so there isn’t much to worry about. At least not yet.

Still, a line must be drawn.

I heard a radio ad recently that directed customers to click their website. “To take advantage of this great deal, click www.wrongwordusingcompany.com.”

Unless all of our computers are going to list every website on the entire Internet for us to scroll through, no one is clicking your website address without the help of google. Most people are smart enough to realize they would need to type that address to “take advantage of the great deal,” but, guaranteed, there are some who won’t.

Having worked years in tech support call centres, there will be at least a half dozen people, inspired by that ad, that will sit down at their computer, stare at the screen for a few moments and then say aloud, “Where?”

Click here to go to my homepage.

But if you’re on a touch screen, tap here.

If you can’t tap or click, use this link.

What was the First Thing you Wrote?

There are many answers to that question, depending on how it is looked at.

In 2010, I self-published my first book. I had never finished a novel before then and considered it to be a tremendous accomplishment. I still do. It was also the first time that my work was available to virtually the entire world. And even though I had done it on my own, I felt like an accomplished writer.

I completed my first lengthy project in college. It wasn’t a novel, but it was my first work longer than a short story. It was a screen play. I remember it quite well. Mikeangelo was a script about a small town artist suddenly thrust into a big city world of art shows and galleries. It probably wasn’t very good, but it was over 100 pages and by far the longest piece of writing I had ever produced.

I spent a lot of my college years writing screenplays. I fell in love with the genre and even made attempts to query agents and production companies. The only attention I received was a request from a small production company in Quebec to read one of my screenplays, though nothing came from the interest. Even so, I was walking the path that most professional writers had to walk to become successful.

In my senior year of high school, I took a creative writing course where I wrote many poems and short stories. It was the first time I can recall my work being read by others that weren’t family members or friends. My writing was critiqued by the class, graded by a teacher and I began to identify writing as a process and put that process into effect. My classmates often seemed impressed with what I produced and it made me consider that I might have had some real talent with writing.

The year before, I was placed at our local newspaper for a work program called co-op. Local businesses were provided a small amount of free labour in exchange for a little glimpse of what the working life was like in a chosen industry. I did a lot of gopher work, which I didn’t mind. Eventually, I was assigned a news story. It was an odd experience. The creative things I had been teaching myself for years all needed to be discarded. The editor explained to me that journalistic writing was about facts, not flowery prose. I didn’t like that side of the writing, but I enjoyed seeing my name and my writing in print.

I was still in grade school when I started my first novel. I had had a dream that a kid’s mom re-married an evil warlock. The kid lived like a prisoner, and through the dream I even lived a short while as a fellow captive. The dream stayed with me for weeks. I had to write it, if only to get it out of my head. Though I never finished that novel, I turned the idea into a screenplay in my college years.

The earliest thing I can remember writing was for my sister. I would have been eight or nine at the time and we were on summer vacation from school. During the summers our parents let us stay up a little later at night. One night, she attempted to write something, though I can’t remember what. As if common with younger siblings, I wanted to do what my big sister was doing. She had been complaining about a friend of hers who had been bullying her earlier in the day. I took the details from her encounter and wrote a little story in the style of an America’s Most Wanted monologue.

I remember finishing it and handing it to my sister to read. I was so proud of it. She read it and handed it back saying, “Hm. It’s good.” Thinking back on it now, it was probably awful, but my sister didn’t want to discourage her little brother and gave me the compliment. At the time it was enough to make me feel like a literary genius.

These were all firsts for me, all in different ways. I suppose they all exist as building blocks toward the writer that I have become, just as future projects will hopefully help me to grow even more.

What was the first thing you wrote?

Bad Reviews

Few things in the literary world scare writers more than bad reviews.

A new writer is scared to get even one bad review, thinking it reflects directly on the work he or she has worked so hard on. Authors bleed onto the page to create their books, so when someone speaks badly, it feels personal.

A novice, who’s put a few things out and experienced the full spectrum of reviews, knows that you’re going to get some good ones and some bad ones. You can’t spend too much time on either. That time is better spent on more writing.

Experienced writers, the ones who have been putting books out for decades, have a memorized list of their favourite bad reviews. Ones that made them laugh the most or shake their head in complete confusion.

Regardless of your experience level, bad reviews are usually not anything to get upset about. Every writer from the unknown to Stephen King gets them. The Great Gatsby, which is voted by many experts to be one of the greatest novels of all time, has over 200 1-star reviews on Amazon. Bad reviews are going to happen, and you are going to get them. The key is to understand them.

Some people are just confused about what your book is about. Maybe it was about their reading level and they didn’t understand it, or maybe they had preconceived notions from the first page that never came true. You can’t usually tell who “just didn’t get it” by their reviews. These are the people that will refer to themes and events that you don’t even remember putting into the book. They often don’t even remember your characters names and end up making reference to characters that never existed.

Books pull on the reader’s emotions, and yours may have pulled on the wrong emotion. Any subject could suddenly cause a reader to have to relive a tragic, or at least negative experience. In these cases, the reader is giving a poor review to their own personal experience, not necessarily the book. It’s not the reader’s fault in this case, he or she is simply unable to detach themselves from the subject matter in order to look at it impartially; it’s human. But, it’s also not the author’s fault. You can’t avoid every subject because someone might not like it. If that was the case there would be nothing to write about.

No matter how well you write, there will always be someone who doesn’t like your book. It’s one of the things that makes the human race as diverse as it is. Think of the worst movie you’ve ever seen. That’s someone’s favourite movie of all time. Your book could be perfect and there will still be a group of people that would cross the street to get away from it. That’s okay. It’s just not for them.

And then there are some people are just mad at the world. These people have never said anything good about anything, because to them nothing is good. These reviews are usually easy to pick out as well. They’ll insult your work without stating any actual reason and usually can be summed up as, “This sucks.” These can be the most insulting of all the types of bad reviews, but should also be the first ones to be dismissed.

Now that you aren’t afraid of getting them, you should know that it’s still important to pay attention to bad reviews. You could learn something about your own book. Secrets of Retail was given a bad review on Amazon that shocked me. The reader listed several problems and I was shocked to realize the reader made a lot of good points. I didn’t feel the book needed changing, but I learned some things about the books and characters in the book.

If you start to see a theme developing in the reviews, that could mean there’s an actual problem with the book. Luckily, a lot of readers are nice about it. Not every bad review will be titled, “Boring boring garbage”–which is one I received on Secrets of Retail.

Good readers, and reviewers, who see a problem with a book will review constructively, bring attention to the problem without being insulting.

We live in a world of social media. Platforms exist everywhere for someone to stand on and make their opinion heard. This, mostly, is a good thing. However, these platforms also provide the chance for conversation to take place. This is not as great; especially if you’re a very opinionated writer who feels the need to “fight back.”

For example, anyone can comment on any review on Amazon. An author can actually reply to all the reviews on his or her book. Even though this exists, I recommend you resist the urge to use it. If you feel to need to have a meltdown, cry and shout, or do anything else about bad reviews, do it silently. Starting an argument with a reviewer can only end badly for you.

You are the author of the book these reviews are written about. You have a name, an identity. Most reviewers are almost completely anonymous. If they say something that sounds stupid, trite, or offensive it won’t link back them. Whatever you say could stick to you for the entire existence of the Internet.

Being a Prolific Writer

I’ve been writing for as long as I can remember, but at the age of 33 I still consider myself more student than master. I’ve self-published a book, have another in the final drafts stage, one more is in the writing stage, and there are dozens of ideas waiting in line for a little attention.

Even so, a Facebook post by friend and fellow writer, Earl Chessher, blew my mind. He wrote that writing 500 words a day would produce a book in about 6 months.

Expounding on that, 500 words a day will give you roughly two books per year, depending on length. 1,000 words a day, 4 books. 2,000 words a day, 8 books. You can do the math from there.

Every writer is different in their abilities and available time. For me, with a full-time job and two kids, 500 would be easy, 1,000 wouldn’t be much problem most days and 2,000 is doable more than once a week. Once I realized that, I had to ask myself: Why haven’t I been writing more?

My first and only book, Secrets of Retail, was self-published in mid-2010. Nearly four years later it’s still my only published novel, self-published or otherwise. From the simple math above, I should have at least seven published books by now.

Okay, seven books in under four years is a little unrealistic for me, especially since there are so many other components in the process. The manuscript goes through various drafts, editing, beta-readers, more editing, more readers, then editing, editing, and more editing. Then, if you take the self-publishing route, there’s still cover design, layout, distribution and much more. So seven is wishful thinking, but one is kind of embarrassing.

The task of completing a book, whether you’re self-publishing or not, is daunting, but achievable. Hundreds, if not thousands, of writers are producing a book, or two, or more every single year.

Appropriately, Earl didn’t only inspire me to be a more prolific writer, he’s a major generator of the written word. In the past five years he has written and published 19 titles including non-fiction books, anthologies, short stories and novellas. Two more are being professionally edited during the writing of this post, soon to be set upon the world.

Another of my most prolific friends is Kelvin V.A. Allison. Since 2008 he has churned out 21 novels even though his time is split between writing, work, family and full-time university.

Earl isn’t a full-time writer and neither is Kelvin. How can they manage every day life and still maintain the output that they do? What’s the secret?

The secret is simple. Some would call it hard work, others drive, but I think the most appropriate word would be discipline.

Earl sits down every day, whether it is first thing in the morning or late at night (sometimes both) and aims to add 3,000 words to the project he’s working on.

Kelvin makes notes everyday on the bus to and from university, and once his household is asleep he sits down to write until 3 AM, consistently aiming for 3,000 words.

The key isn’t the goal of 3,000 words. The goal can be any number of words. The key is consistency. Earl writes every day. Kelvin writes every day. It’s part of their daily schedule and through that discipline it has become part of who they are.

You may ask: How does one stay so disciplined? Since I’m obviously not the best person to ask, I’ve found some answers from writers that never seem to stop producing.

Get Motivated – This could be the most important part. If you don’t have something burning inside of you to make you sit down and write, it’s going to be very difficult. Find things that inspire you to write.

Read and listen to interviews with authors. A lot authors tell their story about being a regular person and  succeeding through hard work and perseverance. Find a hero and keep him or her in mind.

Clip out inspirational sayings, quotes or lines from your favourite authors and books. Keep them someplace where you’ll see them often. A personal favourite of mine comes from Fight Club by Chuck Palahniuk: “This is your life and it’s ending one minute at a time.” Sounds grim, I know, but it reminds me not to waste too much time.

Set a Schedule – No one says you have to write every single day. However, if you want your writing to become a habit, a discipline, set a schedule and follow your schedule.

Three days a week, five, one. Set it and follow it.

Set Reasonable Goals – If you’re just starting out and you don’t know what a reasonable word count is for you, start out with an amount of time. 30 minutes, an hour, two. Start with an amount you know you’re going to be able to commit.

Record how many words you write during each writing session. Once you’ve done 10 – 15 sessions you’ll have a fairly accurate idea of how many words you can handle per day. At that point you can decide to change to a word count goal, or keep going with an allotted time. It’s all up to you.

Don’t Beat Yourself Up – If you miss a writing session don’t beat yourself up, no matter the reason. It’s a sure path to failure.

Beating yourself up is negative reinforcement and, unless you respond well to that, it’s best not take part. Feeling negatively toward yourself may cause you to feel like you’re not a real writer and that you never will be. That negatively could spiral downward until you ask yourself, “What’s the point?”

If you miss a session, just resolve that you will complete your next scheduled session and then do it!

Join a Community – If you’re not already part of a writing group of some sort, join one. Even if you don’t want to meet with a group in person there is an endless list of groups on the internet that discuss writing on a daily basis.

Nothing gives you a kick in the rear like hearing about how much writing your peers are getting done. You’ll want to be able to stand with them and say, “Me too!”

Why not start today? In six months,  or less, you could have a finished manuscript on your hands. Then you’ll have a new question:

I wrote a book, now what?

Resolutions are Made to be Broken, Aren’t They?

It’s almost been a month since 2013 ended. How many resolutions did you make? How many did you keep? According to FranklinCovery statistics, 35% of people will already have ditched their resolutions by now.

I made a few. Eat healthier, exercise more often and write a little every day.

My eating has gotten better. Not by leaps and bounds, but I’m a believer in taking steps. I’ve always felt that going “cold turkey” (where did that saying ever come from?) is s near guarantee failure.

I’m proud to say I exercise a lot more often since the new year. I worked out consistently through most of 2013, but after I broke my arm in early December I mainly sat around crying in my beer. 2014 brought me back to working out almost daily.

The writing is where I’ve slacked off. Considering how important writing is to me, it sure gets pushed to the side easily enough. Freelance work, home repair, favours for friends and even the working out I mentioned earlier have all pushed writing out of the way, leaving my creative juices drying out for days at a time.

Though I’m not happy with my writing in 2014, I’m not giving up.

Most people’s problem with keeping resolutions is not being 100% certain what you’re resolving to do. If you don’t have a few spare hours a day to work out, don’t make that your resolution. Don’t make a resolution out of something that “would be nice” to accomplish, even if it seems unlikely. In fact, don’t consider any resolution as something that “would be nice.” Consider your resolution a “needs to get done.”

Choose something that you know you can do but aren’t doing now. A lot of people might think that a mistake. Why choose a resolution that’s easy to do? Resolutions aren’t for challenging yourself unless you mean to challenge your own laziness.

If you’re like me and you have a resolution that isn’t going very well, now isn’t the time to despair, and it’s not the time to say, “Well, I’ve already screwed it up, I might as well jump ship.” It doesn’t have to be all-or-nothing. There are other ways to look at it.

Keep at it – Just because you’ve missed a day or two, or even a week or two doesn’t mean you can’t pick it back up. No one ever said you can only start doing something on January 1st. Gyms may see a membership boom in January, but there’s just as many people that sign up in the summer when they realize they don’t fit into last year’s bathing suit anymore.

Change it up – Maybe you were a little too over zealous. If your resolution was too much to handle take it back a step, but keep it in the same vein. Don’t have time to work out for 2 hours a day the way you resolved? Pull it back to 1 hour or 45 minutes. Even 20 minutes is better than nothing, isn’t it? I know, eating a Snickers bar is even better, but we’re getting off topic.

Resolve to do it later – Things come up that take you off track. A broken arm, just as a random example. If this is the case, don’t just give up. Set a new start date when your obstacle will have been taken care of.

If it’s something that’s good for you, find a reason to keep going. There’s no reason to be part of the 35% that have already quit on their resolution. And if you didn’t start anything for the new year why not start a mid year’s resolution?